Likes Likes:  54
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 7 of 14 FirstFirst ... 34567891011 ... LastLast
Results 61 to 70 of 142

Thread: ACTICVE SHOOTER TRAINING COMPLETED

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Jafar - I hope you didn't take that as disrespect. I was simply giving my own perspective in conjunction with yours. Being a warrior or sheepdog (or both) is a blessing and a curse. A gift with heavy responsibility.

    What at a great discussion this is!
    “Right, as the world goes, is only in question between equals in power, while the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must.”
    ― Thucydides, The History of the Peloponnesian War

    “Three of the greatest failings, want of sense, of courage, or of vigilance.”
    ― Thucydides, The History of the Peloponnesian War





  2. #2
    Shit Stirrer 0utlaw's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Copperhead Rd
    Posts
    22,443
    If you think you can hurt his feeling THAT easy, you have a rude wake up coming




    Oderint dum metuant

    "Stay with me; do not fear. For he who seeks your life seeks my life, but with me you shall be safe.” 1 Samuel 22:23


    “This gun is liberty; hold for certain that the day when you no more have it, you will be returned to slavery.” – Toussaint L’Ouverture

  3. #3
    Graduate
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    9,290
    Quote Originally Posted by 0utlaw View Post
    If you think you can hurt his feeling THAT easy, you have a rude wake up coming
    What feelings? He gave those up years ago!
    Luck is the phenomena created when Preparation meets Opportunity .

  4. #4
    CCGF Event Planner crawdaddy34's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Sopchoppy
    Posts
    8,389
    Sent from an Altoids Tin via Morse Code



    Quote Originally Posted by Tack Driver View Post
    Craw is right. You guys just can't keep up.




  5. #5
    Administrator Rumbler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Right Here
    Posts
    8,178
    http://www.wctv.tv/home/headlines/Ma...250998651.html


    Man shoots himself in the head at Lake City pawn shop.

    Upon reading this my first reaction was to be angry at the pawn shop guy. Why?

    Because the "customer" took the shotgun, loaded it, stepped back (apparently) and at that point the pawn shop guy had not excised at least the top of the "customer's" head.

    I guess the pawn shop guy was waiting to see if the "customer" was going to shoot him, or himself.

    Dang. Stupid mistake, don't you think?

    Why, you ask? Easy two word answer "OODA Loop". Maybe I am weird, but I can not imagine ever intentionally putting myself behind the bad guy's OODA loop. It just makes no sense to me. In fact, I would bet that if I knew a "reasonable person" they would be inclined to agree . . . . .

    Food for thought. Hopefully the relevance is obvious if subtle.
    I'd rather be lucky than good, but I'd rather KNOW I'm good than HOPE to get lucky.

  6. #6
    Graduate Airgator0470's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    3,753
    Quote Originally Posted by Rumbler View Post
    http://www.wctv.tv/home/headlines/Ma...250998651.html


    Man shoots himself in the head at Lake City pawn shop.

    Upon reading this my first reaction was to be angry at the pawn shop guy. Why?

    Because the "customer" took the shotgun, loaded it, stepped back (apparently) and at that point the pawn shop guy had not excised at least the top of the "customer's" head.

    I guess the pawn shop guy was waiting to see if the "customer" was going to shoot him, or himself.

    Dang. Stupid mistake, don't you think?

    Why, you ask? Easy two word answer "OODA Loop". Maybe I am weird, but I can not imagine ever intentionally putting myself behind the bad guy's OODA loop. It just makes no sense to me. In fact, I would bet that if I knew a "reasonable person" they would be inclined to agree . . . . .

    Food for thought. Hopefully the relevance is obvious if subtle.
    Excellent point... by the time someone's actions make you think "WHAT THE FUCK"... you're pretty much screwed/behind the 8-ball between the "WHAT" and "THE"... failure to act between the "THE" and "FUCK" is what costs the most...
    Signal-0 Productions Firearms Training... for the working man.

  7. #7
    Administrator Rumbler's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Right Here
    Posts
    8,178
    David,

    step #1 is to determine priorities.

    What is more important; public perception or one's own personal perception.

    In the case of Zimmerman - again - it has been decided by a court of law Zimmerman acted legally. IF Zimmerman loses sleep I'd bet it is not because he thinks he acted unethically or illegally.

    As for the rest of the "legal protection". I can't even imagine him not suing the pants off the race baiting bastards that have caused and continue to cause him grief. That IS his legal right.
    I'd rather be lucky than good, but I'd rather KNOW I'm good than HOPE to get lucky.

  8. #8
    Graduate Airgator0470's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    3,753
    Quote Originally Posted by Rumbler View Post
    David,

    step #1 is to determine priorities.

    What is more important; public perception or one's own personal perception.

    In the case of Zimmerman - again - it has been decided by a court of law Zimmerman acted legally. IF Zimmerman loses sleep I'd bet it is not because he thinks he acted unethically or illegally.

    As for the rest of the "legal protection". I can't even imagine him not suing the pants off the race baiting bastards that have caused and continue to cause him grief. That IS his legal right.
    Actually... he was found to have acted WITHIN the law INITIALLY by the agency of initial jurisdiction AND the local SAO, initially, the LAW did protect him... we all know what happened when politics took over...
    Signal-0 Productions Firearms Training... for the working man.

  9. #9
    Supporting Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    1,018
    Rumbler- It's not simply a matter of public perception. Z-man was very lucky that two very competent attorneys stepped up to defend him (of course to get tons of free PR) without bankrupting him. If not for those two guys, he would have been stuck with a public defender -- not to crack on PDs, but they are generally overworked and do not have the same resources -- or bankrupt himself to pay for defense.

    Beyond that, while he prevailed in court what would you say his job prospects are right now? What if he were a professional working in the business community?

    As for the lawsuits, he has what we would think is a slam dunk against NBC yet as far as I know he hasn't seen a dime. They have the lawyers and resources to keep him in court for years and drag it out. Has he actually won any civil suits against anyone? If he's willing to do celebrity boxing matches with DMX I would certainly think he's willing to sue a major news outlet. I think you have WAY overestimated his ability to get compensation for his tarnished name.



    Airgator- I understand I'm not comparing apples to apples. My point is the law is pretty clear on self defense, or at least as clear (if not more) than the authority of citizens vs. LEO. If the law that has been written specifically to protect us didn't protect Z-man (and I'm just using him because it's such a clear misuse of the justice system) then is it unreasonable to believe the same could happen to any of us?


    Actually... he was found to have acted WITHIN the law INITIALLY by the agency of initial jurisdiction AND the local SAO, initially, the LAW did protect him... we all know what happened when politics took over...
    This is exactly the point I'm trying to make. There is the law as it was written and intended, and there is real life. Does it really matter to Z-man that the initial agency and the local SAO acted reasonably? Did it make his situation any better in the long run?

    Again, reading the law I agree with you, it's what happens when politics get involved that worries me.


    btw- I'm not saying I would never run into a situation, I'm just saying there would be a brief moment to really think about it. Of course if it's a school, any place one of mine is in or a host of other scenarios I'm going in no matter what.

  10. #10
    Graduate Airgator0470's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Central Florida
    Posts
    3,753
    Quote Originally Posted by Frady View Post
    Rumbler- It's not simply a matter of public perception. Z-man was very lucky that two very competent attorneys stepped up to defend him (of course to get tons of free PR) without bankrupting him. If not for those two guys, he would have been stuck with a public defender -- not to crack on PDs, but they are generally overworked and do not have the same resources -- or bankrupt himself to pay for defense.

    Beyond that, while he prevailed in court what would you say his job prospects are right now? What if he were a professional working in the business community?

    As for the lawsuits, he has what we would think is a slam dunk against NBC yet as far as I know he hasn't seen a dime. They have the lawyers and resources to keep him in court for years and drag it out. Has he actually won any civil suits against anyone? If he's willing to do celebrity boxing matches with DMX I would certainly think he's willing to sue a major news outlet. I think you have WAY overestimated his ability to get compensation for his tarnished name.



    Airgator- I understand I'm not comparing apples to apples. My point is the law is pretty clear on self defense, or at least as clear (if not more) than the authority of citizens vs. LEO. If the law that has been written specifically to protect us didn't protect Z-man (and I'm just using him because it's such a clear misuse of the justice system) then is it unreasonable to believe the same could happen to any of us?




    This is exactly the point I'm trying to make. There is the law as it was written and intended, and there is real life. Does it really matter to Z-man that the initial agency and the local SAO acted reasonably? Did it make his situation any better in the long run?

    Again, reading the law I agree with you, it's what happens when politics get involved that worries me.


    btw- I'm not saying I would never run into a situation, I'm just saying there would be a brief moment to really think about it. Of course if it's a school, any place one of mine is in or a host of other scenarios I'm going in no matter what.
    All of your concerns ARE valid... no question about it. It's too bad we all have to add such considerations to out total thought process when considering whether or not to act.

    Me... I'll roll the dice in a pure active shooter situation. However, should I see two strangers getting into it... I, as a civilian, perhaps would not be so quick to act for the very reasons you pointed out.

    When we conduct our annual HR218 qualifications, the retired cops are CAUTIONED very strongly against injecting themselves into a situation between two distinct parties. You DO NOT know WHO has done WHAT to initiate the conflict... thus you could very well take action against a real victim w/o knowing it.

    All good points in this thread to consider... in the end, the INDIVIDUAL has to retain the final say-so as to what he or she is willing to do w/o pressure from anyone or anything.
    Signal-0 Productions Firearms Training... for the working man.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •