I AM LOOKING FOR THESE POWDER

[Trob]

I saw 4895 and 4064 at Kevins in Tallahassee today. The 4064 is pretty much the same as 4895

[FLT]

I saw 4895 and 4064 at Kevins in Tallahassee today. The 4064 is pretty much the same as 4895

I think you're mistaken about that . What is the source of your load data?

[Airgator0470]

I think you're mistaken about that . What is the source of your load data?

The burn rates are very close... look at IMR's burn rate chart. They are both billed as versatile powders with a wide range of applications. Of course specific load data should be consulted for specific loads.

Both have an established history with .308 loads.

http://www.imrpowder.com/burn-rate.html

[FLT]

The burn rates are very close... look at IMR's burn rate chart. They are both billed as versatile powders with a wide range of applications. Of course specific load data should be consulted for specific loads.

Both have an established history with .308 loads.

http://www.imrpowder.com/burn-rate.html

Point taken but I still don't think their interchangeable . I tend to follow published load data . I guess I'm just not very adventurous when it comes to reloading.

[Airgator0470]

Point taken but I still don't think their interchangeable . I tend to follow published load data . I guess I'm just not very adventurous when it comes to reloading.

I agree... what I think the other poster was trying to say was IMR 4064 would be a good alternative... I hope so at least. I'd never just swap data based on just burn rates...

[Rumbler]

I saw 4895 and 4064 at Kevins in Tallahassee today. The 4064 is pretty much the same as 4895

I strongly disagree with that statement.

However.

AirGator is dead nuts right on target, at least in my limited experience.