Civil disobedience, by definition, has no rules
Printable View
Civil disobedience, by definition, has no rules
Yeah. well... thanks for the update from the cheap seats. Not only is that utterly wrong as to what civil disobedience is, I have seen no proposal at all for any civil disobedience. Protests at the capitol are petitions of the people for redress of grievances, and are absolutely WITHIN the law, so long as the applicable laws and rules are followed.Quote:
Originally Posted by 0utlaw
Sarcasm is just lost on you crotchety old guys....
:banana:Quote:
Originally Posted by 0utlaw
There is a major difference between sarcasm and plainly wrong information, not to mention the whole lack of visible or audible hints of nuance in electronic communications.Quote:
Originally Posted by 0utlaw
On this I must adhere to an old maxim of my clan: "Say what you mean. Mean what you say. And, FUCK 'EM if they can't take a joke.
The problem with what you said was that if that's what you meant, it ain't what you said. I can only go by what you said... not by what you meant. Communication takes two or more people. It's not locked inside one skull and it doesn't get from one to two or more if it isn't said in a comprehensible manner in the first place.
Comprendo?
Somebody has imbedded a virus in Goodmaker's blog.
Whoa, whoa whoa, back the wagon up. This is starting to make a little sense.Quote:
Originally Posted by WinterSoldier
Schmidity can't take a joke - his avatar - and his fascination of and use of "queer".
Can you explain that statement?Quote:
Originally Posted by Cattle/Horses
Can I, yes.
Will I waste my time doing so for you, no.
When does the other Schmitty's shift start? He's a lot more fun.